Tips to select Final Year Projects

Do not Prefer Application Projects. If you want to do then You can get it from Internet . There won’t be any major scope for the Application projects and there won’t be any waitage to the project in the Interview.

Most of the project centers will rename the topic for a particular topic. Get the base paper and verify with our blog to check the genuinity of the project. Identify the best place to do your projects.


Wireless computing domain : cse/it students are not advised to do projects in wiress computing domain. 100% of the projects done in this domain is fake. Base Paper should not contain wireless, protocols, packets. Obviously, wireless computing domain projects without proper sensors and wireless network formation cannot be done. So students should not prefer wireless domain. Simulation project in wireless costs rs. 250 in the market and it’s of no use.

Question to ask: What’s the sensor we are using? What’s the range of wireless communication happening? How we are connecting to the node. Where the nodes are located. If the nodes are located in the same machine or different machine. Throw away the project.


networking project - A real networking project should have real routers. Instead, if we use pictures as routers then it can’t be a real project and there is no scope for the project. simulation project costs only Rs. 200 in tamil nadu.

Question to ask: what kind of router / switch we are going to use? what kind of programming we are going to do in the router. if there is no router, don’t take up this project.

Wifi Projects are not networking projects. This kind of projects cost Rs.200


grid computing domain : absolutely fake project domain. it’s impossible to construct or design grid in the real world. all final year projects in this domain are fake. Implementing a real grid is not possible for a student. simulating grid related projects cost 400 to 500 rs.

Question to ask: what’s the grid we are going to use? is it oracle grid environment or sql azure environment. project related to this domain is fake. no questions to ask.


Cloud Computing domain – Connecting to the external world Atleast next country is cloud computing. If connected to the remote machine or same machine is a simulation project. Any simulation project under this domain costs 200 rs.

Question to ask: where we are connecting to fetch data? if it’s next machine or same machine then it’s networking project not a cloud computing project. The data should be in remote atleast in other country.


Mobile with wireless domain: all the project in this domain is fake. simulation projects costs 270 rs.

Question to ask: no questions to ask. don’t prefer this domain.


Data mining domain – real data mining involves knowledge cube construction and it’s done by the tools ssas and owb. implementing this project only with java or dotnet is fake. constructino a OLAP environment and using mdx queries to fetch data is the real data mining project. simulation project costs 320 rs.

Question to ask: how we are constructing the cube? how we are fetching the data. project with out cube is absolutely fake.


web mining – collating the real data from internet directly. Data processed in database is absolutely fake. simulation project costs 250 rs.

Question to ask: how dynamically we are retrieving the data from internet? how it’s processed based on the base paper.


REAL TIME SURVEILLANCE SECURITY – REAL CAMERA SHOULD BE USED. using web camera is a FAKE PROJECTS. do not do this kind of project. there won’t be any value for this project.
students are not advised to do projects related to videos. the entire source code is available in internet and there is no scope for these projects.

Question to ask: waste domain. don’t prefer.


NETWORKS domain – ROUTER AND SWITCH IS COMPULSORY for a networking project. PICTURS OF rOUTER/NODES/SWITCH/ SERVER IS absolutely FAKE. simulation project doesn't have value and it costs 300-400 rs.

Question to ask: what kind of router / switch we are going to use? what kind of programming we are going to do in the router. if there is no router, don’t take up the project.


SERVER PERFORMANCE – PROJECT SHOULD BE DONE IN THE REAL SERVER LIKE MACHINE with windows server or web sphere or linux os. the server configuration should be minimal OF QUAD CORE WITH SERVER OPERATING SYSTEM(Windows server or websphere) OR ELSE IT’S FAKE. no value for the simulation projects.

Question to ask: getting the server or configuring the server is too costly. how the performance will be calculated. if it’s local machine, then its waste project.


NEURAL NETWORKS - DO NOT PREFER this domain. it’s OUTDATED DOMAIN

Question to ask: nothing to say. no value for this project.


ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE – real ai cANNot BE implemented by final year project centers due to hardware requirements too. REMODIFICATION OF SMALL PIECE OF CODE IN INTERNET CAN BE DONE. REAL ieee PAPERS CANNOT BE IMPLEMENTED. dO NOT PREFER THIS KIND OF PROJECT for completing your final year projects.

Question to ask: don’t prefer this domain.

Monday 3 September 2012

Independent Directed Acyclic Graphs for Resilient Multipath Routing

IEEE Topics:
            Independent Directed Acyclic Graphs for Resilient Multipath Routing

IEEE Project Title, Year:
IEEE/ACM TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORKING, VOL. 20, NO. 1, FEBRUARY 2012

Abstract:
               In order to achieve resilient multipath routing, we introduce the concept of independent directed a cyclic graphs (IDAGs) in this paper. Link-independent (node-independent) DAGs satisfy the property that any path from a source to the root on one DAG is link-disjoint (node-disjoint) with any path from the source to the root on the other DAG. Given a network, we develop polynomial-time algorithms to compute link-independent and node-independent DAGs. The algorithm developed in this paper: 1) provides multipath routing; 2) utilizes all possible edges; 3) guarantees recovery from single link failure; and 4) achieves all these with at most one bit per packet as overhead when routing is based on destination address and incoming edge. We show the effectiveness of the proposed IDAGs approach by comparing key performance indices to that of the independent trees and multiple pairs of independent trees techniques through extensive simulations.

Problems Encountered in this project:
Ø  This can only be done as a simulation project.
Ø  Partitions along T ¼ 4 axes is quite complex.
Ø  There is high risk of node/link failure and hence it proves costly and time-consuming to decide on the alternate path.
Ø  Also the network T-Grouping is not an easy task.
This is an ARPANET network topology.

                                                 This is an ITALIAN-NET topology. 


                                                                
                                                               This is a mesh topology.


                                                     This is network NJ-LATA topology.


      As per the above topology pictures
                Ø  Establishing links between the nodes is complex.
                Ø  Hence communication through these nodes will definitely  not be possible.

Reasons for declaring this project as fake project:
                Ø  Creation of a single node itself is a time-consuming process.
                Ø  Establishing n number of nodes and creating links between them is highly impossible.
                Ø  Nodes/links failures will be quite common.
              Ø  Hence the important fact of delivering data from source to destination becomes a big question mark.

Suggestions to complete this project as genuine project:
               Ø  This can be done as a research to identify and build proper and stronger nodes.
            Ø  Multiple levels of signal transmissions are required to establish proper communication links among the nodes.
               Ø  The above two steps are really time and money consuming processes.









Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)